HOW WE WOULD REACT TO BEING TAKEN OVER BY FOREIGNERS IN  2007?


Essay by Raymond  S Kraft

Historical  Significance: Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and  hammered England to the  verge of bankruptcy and defeat, and had sunk more than four hundred British  ships in their convoys between England and America  for  food and war materials.  
 
At  that time the US was in an isolationist,  pacifist mood, and most Americans wanted nothing to do with the European or  the Asian war. 
 
Then  along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on  Germany, which had not yet  attacked us.  It was a dicey thing.  We had few allies.  France  was not an ally, as the Vichy government of  France quickly aligned itself  with its German occupiers.  Germany was certainly not an ally, as Hitler was intent on setting up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe.  Japan was not an ally, as it was well on  its way to owning and controlling all of Asia. 
Together, Japan and Germany had long-range plans of invading  Canada and Mexico, as launching  pads to get into the United States over our northern and southern borders,  after they finished gaining control of Asia and Europe.  America's only allies then were England,  Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia.  That was about  it.  All of Europe, from Norway to Italy, except Russia in  the East, was already under the Nazi heel. 
 
America  was certainly not prepared for war.  America had drastically downgraded  most of its military forces after W.W.I and throughout the depression, so  that at the outbreak of WW2, army units were training with broomsticks 
because they didn't have guns, and cars with "tank" painted on the doors  because they didn't have real tanks.  And a huge chunk of our navy had  just been sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor. 

 Britain  had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in  gold bullion in the Bank of England, that was actually the property of  Belgium, given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was  overrun by Hitler (a little known fact).  Actually, Belgium surrendered on one day, because it  was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble  the next day just to prove they could.  Britain had already been  holding out for two years in the face of staggering losses and the near  decimation of its air force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from  being overrun by Germany only because  Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat  that could be dealt with later, and first turning his attention to Russia, at a time when  England was on the verge of  collapse, in the late summer of 1940. 

Ironically,  Russia saved America's butt by putting up a desperate fight for two years,  until the US got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.  
 
Russia  lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad and  Moscow  alone...  90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but  also more than a 1,000,000 soldiers.  
 
Had  Russia surrendered,  Hitler would have been able to focus his entire war effort against the  Brits, then America.  And the Nazis  could possibly have won the war.  
 
All  of this is to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things.  And now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments  in history. 
 
There  is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants and may soon  have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons,  almost anywhere in the world.  The Jihadis, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs -- they believe that Islam, a radically conservative form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East  first, then Europe, then the world.  And that all who do not bow to  their will of  thinking should be killed, enslaved, or subjugated.  They  want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel , and  purge the world of Jews.  This is their mantra. 
 
There  is also a civil war raging in the Middle  East -- for the most part not a hot war, but a war of  ideas.  Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation, but it is  not known yet which will win -- the Inquisitors, or the Reformationists. 
 
If  the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadis, will control the  Middle East, the OPEC oil, and the US, European, and Asian economies.   The techno-industrial economies will be at the mercy of OPEC -- not an OPEC  dominated by the educated, rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated  by the Jihadis.  You want gas in your car?  You want heating oil  next winter?  You want the dollar to be worth anything?  You  better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic  Reformation wins.

If  the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, and live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then  the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away, and a moderate  and prosperous Middle East will emerge. 

 We  have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda and the Islamic terrorist movements We have to do it somewhere.  And we can't do it  everywhere at once.  We have created a focal point for the battle at a  time and place of our choosing........in Iraq.  
 
Not  in New York, not in London, or Paris or  Berlin, but in Iraq, where  we are doing two important things. 
 
(1)  We deposed Saddam Hussein.  Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been actively  supporting the terrorist movement for decades.  Saddam is a  terrorist.  Saddam is, or was, a weapon of mass destruction, who was  responsible for the deaths of probably more than a million Iraqis and two  million Iranians. 
 
(2)  We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism  in Iraq.  We have focused the  battle.  We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there we won't  have to get here.  We also have a good shot at creating a democratic,  peaceful Iraq, which will  be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an  outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed. 
 
World  War II, the war with the German and Japanese Nazis, really began with a  "whimper" in 1928.  It did not begin with Pearl  Harbor.  It began with the Japanese invasion of  China.  It was a war for  fourteen years before America  joined it.  It  officially ended in 1945 -- a 17 year war -- and was followed by another  decade of US occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries  reconstructed and running on their own again ...  a 27 year war.  
 
World  War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's  GDP -- adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars.  
W.W.II cost America more than 400,000 killed  in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action. 
 
The  Iraq war has, so far,  cost the US about $160  billion,which is roughly what 9/11 cost New York.  It has also cost about  3,000 American lives, which is roughly equal to the 3,000 lives that the  Jihad snuffed on 9/11.  But the cost of not fighting and winning W.W.II  would have been unimaginably greater -- a world dominated by German and  Japanese Nazism.
 
This  is not a 60 minute TV show, or a 2 hour movie in which everything comes out okay. 
 
The  real world is not like that.  It is messy, uncertain, and sometimes bloody and ugly.  Always has been, and probably always will be. 
 
The  bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is.  It will not go away if we ignore it.  
 
If  the US can create a  reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an  "  England"  in the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and  moderate the Middle East.  The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and  civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates.  The  Iraq war is merely another battle  in this ancient and never ending war.  And now, for the first time  ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons.  Unless somebody  prevents them. 
 
We  have four options: 
1.   We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.  
 
2.   We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which maybe as  early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what  Iran claims it is)  
 
3.   We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East  now, and in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America. 

4.   Or, we can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and  Germany and maybe most of  the rest of Europe.  It will, of  course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier. 
If  you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an  America that resembles  Iran today. 

The  history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes.  All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.  Those  who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always  lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.  
 
Remember,  perspective is everything, and America's schools teach too  little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American  mind. 
 
The  Cold war lasted from about 1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989.  Forty-two years.  Europe spent the first half of the  19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany World  War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the  US still has troops in Germany and Japan. World War II resulted in the death  of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people,  depending on which
estimates you accept. 
 
The  US has taken more than  3,000 killed in action in Iraq.  The  US took more than 4,000  killed in action on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the  Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.  In W.W.II, the  US averaged 2,000 KIA a week --  for four years.  Most of the individual battles of W.W.II lost more  Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far. 
 
But  the stakes are at least as high ...  A world dominated by  representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal  freedoms ...  or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi  movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).  
 
It's  difficult to understand why the American left does not grasp this.  They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently  not for Iraqis.
 
"Peace  Activists" always seem to demonstrate here in America,  where it's safe.
 
Why  don't we see Peace Activists demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea,  in the places that really need peace activism the most?  
 
The  liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights,  democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins,  wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights,  democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.  
 
Americans  who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side  of their own worst  enemy.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Raymond  S Kraft is a writer living in Northern  California.  Please consider passing along copies of this  article to students in high school, college and university as it contains  information about the American past that is very meaningful today -- history  about America that very likely is completely unknown by them (and their  instructors, too).  By being denied the facts of our history, they are  at a decided disadvantage when it comes to reasoning and thinking through  the issues of today.  They are prime targets for misinformation campaigns beamed at enlisting them in causes and beliefs that are special-interest-agenda-driven. 


HOME
Site Meter